March 19, 2026
75% of all psychiatric disorders emerge before age 24. Yet young adults between 18 and 25 remain the least likely demographic to seek or receive mental health support. In industrialized cultures that promote individual autonomy, this period of emerging adulthood is characterized by profound transitions: leaving home, pursuing higher education, entering the workforce, and consolidating a long-term identity (Arnett, 2000). Not coincidentally, it is also the developmental period in which the prevalence of untreated mental health disorders soars to its highest (SAMHSA, 2024). For HR leaders, benefits administrators, and higher education professionals, your students and youngest employees are entering the most neurologically vulnerable period of their lives, and the window to intervene effectively is narrow.
The 18-25 age bracket is a critical window for mental health intervention because the brain is still actively under construction. Modern neuroimaging has refuted the assumption that brain development ends in early adolescence by revealing a second, massive wave of neurological reorganization that extends well into the mid-to-late twenties (Giedd, 2015).
During emerging adulthood, the limbic system—which houses the amygdala and the brain's reward-processing circuitry—is fully mature and highly sensitized. However, the prefrontal cortex—the "CEO" of the brain responsible for impulse control, long-term planning, emotional regulation, and rational decision-making—is the very last region to mature, continuing to develop until around age 25.
This creates a precarious developmental mismatch. Emerging adults experience emotions, social feedback, and reward seeking with incredible intensity. However, while they possess the legal autonomy and physical capability to engage in high-risk situations, they lack the fully developed executive scaffolding required to safely modulate the intense emotional and cognitive demands of those situations.
Extensive epidemiological data confirm that 75% of all psychiatric disorders emerge by the age of 24 (Kessler et al., 2005). A recent massive meta-analysis found that the peak median age of onset across all mental disorders is roughly 14.5 to 18 years old (Solmi et al., 2022). This means that by the time an individual enters emerging adulthood, the prodromal (early warning) signs of severe mental illnesses—including major depressive disorder, severe anxiety, and schizophrenia—are actively manifesting.
Delaying treatment during this critical period can have devastating, long-term structural consequences for the brain. Longitudinal studies tracking young adults with untreated major depressive disorder (MDD) have found physical alterations in brain structure. Prolonged, untreated depression is associated with cortical thinning (Bos et al., 2018) and physical atrophy (shrinkage) of the hippocampus—a brain region critical for memory and learning. The number of days a young adult spends suffering from untreated depression has a direct, negative impact on hippocampal volume (MacQueen et al., 2003).
Similarly, in psychotic disorders, a longer duration of untreated psychosis is directly correlated with worse long-term clinical trajectories, including more severe negative symptoms, higher relapse rates, and a lower likelihood of achieving symptom remission (Penttilä et al., 2014; Perkins et al., 2005). Early intervention is not just about symptom relief; it is about protecting the developing brain and preventing chronic illness.
"Early intervention is not just about symptom relief — it is about protecting the developing brain and preventing chronic illness."
Given the neurobiological stakes and the high rates of distress, it is alarming that emerging adults have the lowest rates of mental health service utilization. When evaluating why this demographic avoids care, it is easy to point to systemic barriers. However, the most formidable barrier to care for 18–25-year-olds may not be structural but psychological: the preference for self-reliance, deeply entangled with internalized stigma (Ishikawa et al., 2023; Meadley, Rickwood, & Ishikawa, 2024; Rickwood et al., 2005; SAMHSA, 2024).
In emerging adulthood, the primary developmental mandate is establishing independence and autonomy. Young adults are actively trying to prove to themselves, their parents, and society that they can navigate the world on their own. Consequently, seeking professional help is frequently interpreted as a surrender of their newly won autonomy.
Of course, this sort of denial and avoidance can be the very thing that leads to a loss of that autonomy. For example, a young adult experiencing the early stages of severe anxiety and attempting to manage it alone will often turn to unguided internet searches or substance use to self-medicate. By the time they realize their self-help strategies are failing, the disorder may have entrenched itself, and their academic or professional lives may already be unraveling.
We cannot simply tell young adults to "ask for help" and expect them to abandon their developmental drive for autonomy. Instead, interventions must respect their need for independence and reframe help-seeking as a tool for empowerment.
Recent psychological research reveals that self-reliance is not inherently bad; rather, it exists on a continuum (Meadley, Rickwood, & Ishikawa, 2024). Healthy, adaptive self-reliance involves a balance of trusting oneself and trusting others. Interventions and public health campaigns must frame professional help not as a crutch or a surrender of autonomy, but as an expert consultation that the young adult directs.
One way to align therapy with independence is through the use of digital self-help tools. While there is a strong and growing community of researchers and practitioners open to exploring applications of digital mental health tools (Torous et al., 2021), a pervasive, categorical bias against them persists among many therapists. This resistance is rooted in understandable fears: concerns regarding data privacy, the proliferation of untested "wellness" apps in commercial marketplaces, and the foundational belief that genuine healing requires a therapeutic alliance. Opponents to the use of digital mental health tools worry that their increased use will result in delayed “real” care or harmful guidance (with plentiful media examples of generative AI “gone wrong”), reinforcement of social avoidance and isolation (which may be the root problem that needs addressing), and the loss of traditional humanist values.
However, from a public health perspective, this line of thinking is dangerously similar to the mindset behind abstinence-only sex education: they are essentially arguing, “Mental health care should only occur within the context of a long-term, committed relationship with a licensed therapist.” When it comes to stopping young people from getting bad mental health guidance from the internet or social media, quite simply, they are “going to do it anyway.” It is therefore incumbent upon us to provide them with vetted, evidence-based tools that maximize efficacy and minimize risk.
Digital Mental Health Interventions (DMHIs), such as unguided internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (iCBT) apps, appeal directly to a young person's desire for privacy and autonomy (Pretorius, Chambers, & Coyle, 2019). These digital platforms can act as a crucial first step, allowing users to build mental health literacy and practice self-management privately. Once engaged, these platforms can be designed to gently "nudge" users toward face-to-face clinical care if their reported symptoms escalate beyond what self-help can safely manage. Behavioral economics research indicates that "nudges" utilizing positive framing are highly effective in encouraging help-seeking behaviors (Yeung et al., 2025).
We cannot afford to let millions of young adults fall through the cracks, silently enduring distress because they mistakenly believe independence means suffering alone. Instead of highlighting the negative consequences of untreated depression or anxiety, messaging targeted at the 18-25 demographic should highlight how therapy optimizes performance, builds resilience, and enhances a young adult's capacity to achieve their personal, academic, and professional goals. Prioritizing early, proactive interventions—such as digital gateways—respects their developmental need for autonomy. Before we can nudge them toward the most effective help resources, we have to first meet them where they are.
Dr. Jason Shumake is the Director of Data Science and Clinical Research at Aiberry, specializing in computational psychiatry, precision psychological medicine, and digital mental health. He previously served as a Research Professor and Chief Data Scientist at the University of Texas at Austin’s Institute for Mental Health Research, where his work included partnering with UT’s Counseling and Mental Health Center. Across his academic and industry career, he has co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed publications, extensively evaluating treatments for depression and anxiety and using machine learning to predict the efficacy of internet-based behavioral interventions. Currently, Dr. Shumake is dedicated to transforming how we screen and engage people with untreated mental health challenges, leveraging technology to make mental health assessments more objective, accessible, and empowering for those taking their first step toward treatment.
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
Bos, M. G. N., Peters, S., van de Kamp, F. C., Crone, E. A., & Tamnes, C. K. (2018). Emerging depression in adolescence coincides with accelerated frontal cortical thinning. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 59(9), 994–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12895
Giedd J. N. (2015). The amazing teen brain. Scientific American, 312(6), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0615-32
Ishikawa, A., Rickwood, D., Bariola, E., & Bhullar, N. (2023). Autonomy versus support: self-reliance and help-seeking for mental health problems in young people. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 58(3), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02361-4
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of general psychiatry, 62(6), 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593
MacQueen, G. M., Campbell, S., McEwen, B. S., Macdonald, K., Amano, S., Joffe, R. T., Nahmias, C., & Young, L. T. (2003). Course of illness, hippocampal function, and hippocampal volume in major depression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(3), 1387-1392. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0337481100
Meadley, A., Rickwood, D., & Ishikawa, A. (2024). Young adults’ perceptions of the role of self-reliance and trust on help seeking for mental health problems. Youth, 4(4), 1726-1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth4040109
Penttilä, M., Jääskeläinen, E., Hirvonen, N., Isohanni, M., & Miettunen, J. (2014). Duration of untreated psychosis as predictor of long-term outcome in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry : The Journal of Mental Science, 205(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.127753
Perkins, D. O., Gu, H., Boteva, K., & Lieberman, J. A. (2005). Relationship between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia: a critical review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(10), 1785–1804. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1785
Pretorius, C., Chambers, D., & Coyle, D. (2019). Young people's online help-seeking and mental health difficulties: Systematic narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(11), e13873. https://doi.org/10.2196/13873
Rickwood, D., Deane, F. P., Wilson, C. J., & Ciarrochi, J. (2005). Young people’s help-seeking for mental health problems. Australian E-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 4(3), 218–251. https://doi.org/10.5172/jamh.4.3.218
Solmi, M., Radua, J., Olivola, M., Croce, E., Soardo, L., Salazar de Pablo, G., Il Shin, J., Kirkbride, J. B., Jones, P., Kim, J. H., Kim, J. Y., Carvalho, A. F., Seeman, M. V., Correll, C. U., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2022). Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Molecular Psychiatry, 27(1), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7
SAMHSA [Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration]. (2024). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP24-07-021). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Torous, J., Bucci, S., Bell, I. H., Kessing, L. V., Faurholt-Jepsen, M., Whelan, P., Carvalho, A. F., Fleetwood-Flump, M., Linardon, J., Peskin, A. V., & Firth, J. (2021). The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry, 20(3), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20883
Yeung, S., Mak, W. W., Cheung, G. M., Li, C. W., Yu, H. C., & Zheng, Y. (2025, July 4). A Systematic Review of Nudging in the Mental Health Contexts - Progress, Findings, and Ways Forward. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6smj5_v3
